Ajeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38529 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -379 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHEBPUR KAMAL District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Ajeet Yadav S/o Satya Narayan Yadav @ Sato Yadav, R/o Vill.- Hira Tol, P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal , District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nakul Kumar Jamuar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 379 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 380, 307, 329 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner that he along with others entered into house of the informant and asked to pay Rs. 2,000/- as his motor cycle got damaged from the wall of the informant and in that course, they fired from their pistol and looted away the gold ornaments and other articles. It is further alleged that the firing made by the accused persons, hit the daughter and grand daughter of one Dinesh Yadav causing injuries to him.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case, which will appear from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38529 of 2018 (2) dt.02-07-2018 2/2 the fact that for the same occurrence two F.I.Rs have been lodged one by the present informant and one by Dinesh Yadav and in the F.I.R lodged by the Dinesh Yadav petitioner is not alleged to be the assailant, however, in the F.I.R. lodged by the present informant, the petitioner has been shown to be the assailant, which is a false and concocted story.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application is accordingly dismissed.

However, the petitioner, if so desire, may surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, which will be considered by the court below on the merit of the case. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T