Rishavraj Singh @ Shubham Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43484 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2018 Thana -MAUZAHIDPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Rishavraj Singh @ Shubham Kumar, Son of Alok Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Katghar, P.S.- Babarganj (Mojahidpur) DistrictBhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Nandad Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Mozahidpur (Babarganj) P.S. Case No. 3/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 364, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the written report. There is specific allegation against co-accused Kundan Yadav of giving knife blow to the informant. Name of this petitioner has come during course of investigation only on suspicion.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43484 of 2018 (3) dt.09-08-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Mozahidpur (Babarganj) P.S. Case No. 3/2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T