Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80509/2019bail granted

Vinod Nat v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80509 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2019 Thana- DHANSOI DistrictBuxar ====================================================== VINOD NAT Son of Late Lalan Nat Resident of Village - Babhanauliya, P.S.- Dhansoin, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

Ms. Veena Rani Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 07.11.2019 in connection with Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 127 of 2019, Excise G.R. no. 710 of 2019, for the offences alleged under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 16.200 litres of English Whisky from the house of the petitioner. It is submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner who has no concern with the seized goods. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the period of custody already suffered for more than a month, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.IInd-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Buxar, in connection with Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 127

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80509 of 2019(2) dt.20-12-2019 2/2 of 2019, Excise G.R. No. 710 of 2019, on the following conditions- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T