Praduman Kumar Bhagat @ Praduman Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82620 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2019 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== PRADUMAN KUMAR BHAGAT @ PRADUMAN BHAGAT Son of Shiv Shankar Bhagat @ Shiv Shankar Singh Resident of Village - Dhanauti, P.S.- Daraunda, Distt - Siwan ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Prashant Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mrs.Madhuri Lata, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no allegation of assault by knife against the petitioner and petitioner and one other co-accused are alleged to have taken Rs.10,000/- from the drawer of informant's shop, which is ornamental. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is in custody in the instant case since 6.10.2019. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Daraunda Police Station Case No. 230 of 2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82620 of 2019(2) dt.12-12-2019 2/2 his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T