← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1427/2025disposed

Bageshwari Prasad @ Vageshwari Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-28Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1427 of 2025 ====================================================== Bageshwari Prasad @ Vageshwari Prasad Son of Krishnanand Singh, Resident of Village Khatagi Chandokhar Hamakhas P.O.- Mow, P.S. Banshi, District- Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Gaya. 2.

The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Gaya.

3.

The Addl. Collector, Gaya, District- Gaya.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Gaya, District- Gaya. 5.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar Gaya, District- Gaya. 6.

The Circle Officer, Gaya Circle, District- Gaya. 7.

The Municipal Commissioner, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya, DistrictGaya. 8.

Dilip Kumar, Son of Ram Naresh Sharma, Resident of Khotaghi Chandokhar P.S. Banshi District Arwal.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Government Pleader 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Gaya Municipal Corporation.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed a representation before the Commissioner, Gaya Municipal Corporation on 19.06.2024 and the same is still pending for consideration and the Commissioner had not disposed of the representation of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that the writ petition be disposed of with a

Patna High Court CWJC No.1427 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2025 2/2 direction to the Municipal Commissioner, Gaya (Respondent No. 7) to dispose of the representation of the petitioner which is still pending for consideration within a period of two months, in accordance with law, after hearing all the concerned, if so required.

3. With the aforesaid liberty/direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ranjeet/- U