Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90147/2025bail rejected

Pramendra Gond v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-03Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90147 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2025 Thana- Karvandiya District- Rohtas ====================================================== PRAMENDRA GOND Son of Dev Gond R/o Village - Basantpur, P.S.- Karwandiya, District - Rohtas (Sasaram) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Session Trial Case No. 369 of 2025 arising out of Karwandiya P.S. Case no. 29 of 2025, for the offence under sections 191(2),190,109,115(2),126(2),117(2),118(1),352 of BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant gave his fardbeyan to the SHO, Karwandiya P.S. on 07.04.2025 alleging therein that on 06.04.2025 at 09:00 PM, the petitioner and his friend, namely, Shudhir Kumar while coming from Karwandiya to Wajirganj, in the meantime at Wajirganj More, all named accused persons including the petitioner and 4-5 unknown persons having country-made pistol and sword were waiting there. It is further alleged that the petitioner got down from black pulsar (motorcycle) and on the point of pistol asked about his brother Dilipwa and started assaulting. The petitioner is said to have assaulted by sword on the head of the informant, which hit the ear

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90147 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2026 2/2 of the informant resulting in the ear getting cut. Sudhir received head injury and thereafter fled away.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The injuries are simple in nature. There is no eye-witness of the occurrence.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Earlier also, the petitioner had moved an application for bail vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 52666 of 2025, which was rejected on 13.08.2025, considering the fact that the petitioner has 14 criminal antecedents and also that the petitioner has been alleged to have assaulted the informant on the head with a sword, which could have proved very fatal. The petitioner has not been able to make out any case of changed circumstances thereafter, and therefore, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner is rejected.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) kundan/- U T