← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./88527/2025bail granted

Pammy Devi @ Pammy Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88527 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-847 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBuxar ====================================================== Pammy Devi @ Pammy Chaubey, W/o Arjesh Kumar Chaubey, resident of village-Dehri P.S.- Buxar Muffasil, Dist- Buxar, At present Jail Road Gayatri Nagar Buxar, P.S.- Buxar Town, Dist- Buxar ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Chanchala Devi, W/o Bipin Bihari Diwedi, R/o Sohani Patti, P.S.- Buxar Town, Dist- Buxar.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The accused/petitioner apprehending her arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 847(c) of 2021, in which cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under Sections 467 and 468 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is to cheat informant by creating forged document related with plot no. 389 of Mauza Pandeypatti, P.S.-Buxar Town, District -Buxar.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88527 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the purchaser of the land in issue after paying consideration amount. It is pointed out that the petitioner herself is the victim of circumstance. It is pointed out that out of family dispute with cousin brother, the petitioner was implicated with present case by informant without having no occasion. While concluding argument, it is submitted that the dispute is purely civil in nature, for which the present criminal case was completely unoccasioned. Petitioner is said to be a lady of clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of fact as the dispute primarily appears civil in nature, where petitioner is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88527 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.-1st Class, Court No.4 at Buxar/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Complaint Case No. 847(c) of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the BNSS. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Sanjeet/- U T