Jitendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41185 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -158 Year- 2018 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== Jitendra Singh, son of Ashok Singh, resident of village - Dhabauli, P.S. Muffasil, District - Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Meena Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Muffasil (Lakho) P.S. Case No. 158 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 143, 144, 307, 436, 427, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

In the written report it is alleged that on the order of Phulena Rai, the accused persons made firing and son of Phulena Rai set fire in the wooden shop of the informant. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no allegation of any specific overt act against the petitioner. The petitioner is only alleged to be member of an unlawful assembly. From written report it is apparent that nobody has sustained injury.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41185 of 2018 (2) dt.16-07-2018 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Muffasil (Lakho) P.S. Case No. 158 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.

U T