Rakesh Ranjan Mishra @ Rajesh Ranjan Mishra @ Bablu Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1655 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2023 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rakesh Ranjan Mishra @ Rajesh Ranjan Mishra @ Bablu Jha S/O Tuntun Jha Resident of Village - Sahebpur Kamal, P.S- Sahebpur Kamal, DistrictBegusari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 504, 325, 498A, 307 and 34 of the IPC and Section 3/4 of the D.P Act. 3.

As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioner are said to have mentally tortured and assaulted the daughter of the informant by means of lathi, danda and caused her badly injured. After that they took her away in a car and threw her in the Battiya Valley in Jamui. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1655 of 2025(2) dt.13-02-2025 2/2 due to enmity. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that they were going to Deoghar by car in the meantime they met with an accident. There was no intention to cause death as there was no intervening circumstance and the so called injured was found conscious and alive by the police in Jamui. There is no allegation against the petitioner to tamper the evidence. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent and has been rotting in judicial custody since 03.01.2024.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and the period of custody, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No.89 of 2023.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T