← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13932/2018disposed

Ranjan Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-19Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13932 of 2018 ====================================================== Ranjan Gupta, son of Dayanand Sah, resident of Village Mirzapur, Post Sonbarsa, P.S. Barauli, District Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Bihar Prohibition and Excise Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj.

4. The Officer-In-Charge of Barauli Police Station, District Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha- GA-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-07-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Mahindra Scorpio) bearing Registration No. BR-05P8589, which has been seized in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 154 of 2018 due to violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings, vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending

Patna High Court CWJC No.13932 of 2018(2) dt.19-07-2018 2/2 finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing two sureties to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Gopalganj within a period of one week from the date of his furnishing the sureties and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case so as to cause adverse effect or prejudice to the State Government.

The valuation of the vehicle in question shall be done as per the valuation shown in the insurance document. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Sunil/- U