Sonu Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.252 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2022 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sonu Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Verma Son of Late Dharmendra Mehta @ Dharmendra Prasad Resident of Village- Godiyapur, P.S.- Kutumba, Distt.- Aurangabad, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Ms. Shrishti Rani, Advocate For the State :
Md. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have shot in the stomach of informant with pistol due to which he became injured.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, the alleged occurrence was committed by some unknown persons and due to on going dispute between the informant and this petitioner, he has falsely been implicated in this case. As per F.I.R., the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.252 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 alleged occurrence took place in darkness and there was no source of identification.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation of causing fire arm injury against him. It is further submitted that petitioner has also got one criminal antecedent.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, specific and direct nature of accusation and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T