Mahtab Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87436 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-522 Year-2025 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Mahtab Alam Son of Aftab Alam Resident of Village - Meerapur, P.S. - Siwan Muffasil, District - Siwan 2.
Sagufta Naaz @ Sagufta Praveen Daughter of Aftab Alam Resident of Village - Meerapur, P.S. - Siwan Muffasil, District - Siwan 3.
Aftab Alam son of Late Taiyab Alam Resident of Village - Meerapur, P.S. - Siwan Muffasil, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 303(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioners abused and assaulted the nephew of the informant. It is alleged that petitioner no. 1 assaulted the informant's nephew by means of farsa, petitioner no. 3 assaulted him by lathi-danda and petitioner no. 2 snatched gold chain from his neck.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87436 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case malafide and ulterior motive. Further submission is that on the alleged date of occurrence, a free fight took place between the parties in which both sides sustained some injuries. There is case and counter case between the parties for the said occurrence. The nature of the injury to the injured is simple caused by hard blunt substance. The doctor has not found any sharp cut injury and thus the injury report does not support the version of the prosecution case. Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have no criminal antecedent whereas petitioner no. 3 has one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the bail application.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87436 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 3/3 Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 522 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T