Santosh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46763 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2018 Thana -ASHTHWAN District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Santosh Yadav S/o Umesh Yadav resident of Village - Chotaki Dhanuki, P.S. Manpur, District Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satya Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2018 Heard the parties.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Asthawan P.S.Case No.21 of 2018 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504 of I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is that on receipt of the information that the persons of two groups were fighting in the village when the informant reached the place of occurrence and saw they were abusing each other and there was indiscriminate firing from each other.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though there was indiscriminate firing but nobody has received any injury and the F.I.R. shows that there was firing from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46763 of 2018 (2) dt.13-08-2018 2/2 both sides.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M.,Nalanda at Biharsharif, in Asthawan P.S. Case No.21 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. and (1) one of the bailors must be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) the petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence and the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U