Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance, Patna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47467 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2018 Thana -RAHUI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================
1. Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Son of Tahal Paswan, resident of Barandi, P.S. Rahui, District- Nalanda, Presently posted as Shiksha Mitra .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through Vigilance, Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Anita Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma(L.O., I/C, Vigi.) For the informant : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 39/2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 7 & 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act..
Allegation against the petitioner is that by changing his name and date of birth, he has appeared twice in the matriculation examination and on the basis second matriculation certificate, he secured the appointment as teacher.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has not played in fraud in securing the appointment of teacher and no allegation of Prevention of Corruption Act is made out against
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47467 of 2018 (2) dt.16-08-2018 2/2 the petitioner and it is not the case that he secured appointment on the basis of documents of other person.
Heard learned A.P.P. who opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather he should surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, which would be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by order of this Court.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T