Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1463/2025dismissed

Rambha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1463 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2024 Thana- JEHANABAD RAIL P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Rambha Kumari W/o Gulshan Kumar Resident Of Village- Dahi Bhatta, PsMasaurhi, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-04-2025 Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with G.R.P. Jehanabad (Taregana) P.S. Case No. 24 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of getting her father-in-law killed.

4. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a lady and her involvement has come on the statement of co-accused Prince Kumar and Shyam Kishore Sharma but she is not involved in the crime. He further submits that co-accused Shyam Kishore

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1463 of 2025(3) dt.09-04-2025 2/2 Sharma has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

5. Learned A.P.P. For the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. I have considered the the submissions of the parties.

7. The petitioner has got her father-in-law killed because he was a drunkard and he was selling the land. Materials have come in the case diary in support of the allegation levelled against the petitioner.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is dismissed.

9. The findings of this order shall not prejudice the petitioner in her trial.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T