Md. Naiyer Alam @ Naiyar Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88774 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2025 Thana- PALANWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Md. Naiyer Alam @ Naiyar Alam Son of Sheikh Tauhuddin @ Md Tauhiddudin Resident of Hajrat Khanwah Road, Munger, Police Station - Kasim Bazar, District - Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Mayank Raj, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Adarsh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2) of the BNS and under Sections 25(1-b)a, 25(1)(a)(c), 25(1)(1-AA), 25(1-B(C), 26, 28 & 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had secret information that in village Gadh Sirisiya accused Pankaj Kumar is running a gun factory in his poultry farm. Thereafter, the said poultry farm was raided and from that poultry farm many articles and arms were recovered. On being asked, Pankaj Kumar disclosed that he collects raw materials from the petitioner and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88774 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/2 others.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that save and except the statement of Pankaj Kumar, there is nothing against the petitioner. Only two mobile phones were recovered when the house of the petitioner was raided. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.04.2025.

5. Learned Additional Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Palanawa P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T