Salita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46805 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2018 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Salita Devi W/o Umesh Ram Residentof Village - Mathurapur Tola, P.S. Bihta, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 98/2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323, 354(kh), 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he has taken away lota and glass from the house of the informant. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that allegation of assault is against other co-accused persons and the petitioner is a lady and falsely been implicated in this case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46805 of 2018 (2) dt.13-08-2018 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 98/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on her part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of her bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T