Sunny Deoal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87081 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-713 Year-2024 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Sunny Deoal S/o Alok Singh R/o Village- Bahuriya Bigha, P.S- Barun, DistAurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard Ms. Mukul Kumari,, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No. 713 of 2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 303(2) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, motorcycle of the informant was stolen near his shop.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the stolen motorcycle of the informant was recovered from the possession of the co-accused Deepak Kumar, who was taken
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87081 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 into custody and on his confessional statement, name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case. Petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and also the fact that recovery of stolen motorcycle of the informant has been made from the possession of co-accused, Deepak Kumar and on whose confessional statement, name of the petitioner has surfaced in the present case and confessional statement made before police has no evidentiary value, I am of the opinion that petitioner, who is having clean antecedent, has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad / Concerned Court in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87081 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No. 713 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T