Rajmanti Devi v. State Prevention For Cruelty To Animal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL REVIEW No.13 of 2024 In CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1377 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.
Rajmanti Devi Wife of Late Amar Paswan Resident of Mohalla Mainpura P.S. Patliputra District Patna.
2.
Rajnandna Paswan Son of late Sant Lall Paswan Resident of Mohalla Mainpura P.S. Patliputra District Patna.
3.
Jiran Paswan Son of Late Sakaldeo Paswan Resident of Mohalla Mainpura P.S. Patliputra District Patna.
4.
Rajnath Paswan Son of late Tulsi Paswan Resident of Mohalla Mainpura P.S. Patliputra District Patna.
5.
Avinash Paswan @ Bhola Paswan Son of Sri Rajnath Paswan Resident of Mohalla Mainpura P.S. Patliputra District Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
State Prevention For Cruelty To Animal Bihar Patna through its Secretary Sri Ratneshwar Prasad Singh.
2.
Sri Ratneshwar Prasad Singh son of Shri Parmeshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Daya Mandir Bhawan, Patliputra Colony, Police SatitionPatliputra, District-Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Sumit Kumar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 30-08-2024 Civil Review No.13 of 2024 arising from order dated 03.11.2023 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No.1377 of 2017:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present Civil Review No.13 of 2024 has been filed for review of the order dated 03.11.2023 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No.1377 of 2017 on the ground
Patna High Court C. REV. No.13 of 2024(8) dt.30-08-2024 2/2 mentioned in the petition with request that the said order be modified.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on merit or demerit of the judgment, he is not saying anything, but he only submits that the observation made in the order dated 03.11.2023 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No.1377 of 2017 be finalized within a specific period of time.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if, petitioners does not want to pursue for review of the order, then he is also interested that the said order dated 03.11.2023 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No.1377 of 2017 be complied within a fixed period of time.
5. In this view of the matter, the present Civil Review No.13 of 2024 is hereby dismissed with a direction that the order which has been passed in the Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No.1377 of 2017 be implemented in true spirit preferably within six months from today.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U