Ram Pravesh Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50288 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2018 Thana -RIGA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Ram Pravesh Das, son of late Dhodhai Das, R/o Village- Riga Tole, Pipra, P.S. Riga, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mustaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 27-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Riga P.S. Case No.131 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 363, 366-A Indian Penal Code.

In the written report, there is specific allegation against co-accused, Govind Das, of kidnapping the daughter of the informant.

The victim girl has given her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein, she has not levelled any specific allegation against petitioner. She has taken the name of Vikram and Govind.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50288 of 2018 (2) dt.27-08-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Riga P.S. Case No.131 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- Rohit Kr.

U T