Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5670/2024rejected

Pramod Thakur @ Pramod Kumar Thakur @ Parmod Kr. Thaur v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-26Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5670 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-363 Year-2023 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Pramod Thakur @ Pramod Kumar Thakur @ Parmod Kr. Thaur S/O Late Ram Bilash Thakur R/O Village-Govindpur, P.S.-Mahua, District-Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Shankar Das For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahua P.S. Case no. 363 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with co-accused person, Hiraman Bhagat have killed the brother of informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Informant is not an eye

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5670 of 2024(4) dt.26-07-2024 2/2 witness of the alleged offence. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has vehemently opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and several witnesses have supported the prosecution version of the case that petitioner along with co-accused Hiraman Bhagat has assaulted the informant's brother, namely, Rajesh Rai due to which he succumbed to injuries.

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

7. The petitioner is directed to surrender before learned court below and pray for regular bail. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Nirajkrs/- U