Madhavi Devi @ Madhuri Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48149 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2012 Thana -RAJAUN District- BANKA ======================================================
1. Madhavi Devi @ Madhuri Devi Wife of Prabhash Choudhary
2. Nibha Devi Wife of Prashant Choudhary Both are residents of Village - Sohli, P.S. Rajoun, District Banka.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Rajoun P.S.Case No.94 of 2012 dated 29.6.2012 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 325, 379, 384, 386 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners as per FIR is of demand of Rangdari and assault.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is no allegation of demand of Rangdari against these petitioners and also not of assault. Petitioners are even not sent up for trial but later on cognizance has been taken. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48149 of 2018 (2) dt.21-08-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Banka in connection with Rajoun P.S.Cae NO.94 of 2012, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T