← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90097/2024bail granted

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-15Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90097 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2024 Thana- Dehri Mufassil District- Rohtas ====================================================== MANISH KUMAR S/O SHAMBHU RAM Resident of Village- Ratwar, Police Station- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-02-2025 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Dehri (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 115 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, on 11.07.2024, the informant parked his Tempo outside the Railway Station, Dehri. Three accused persons came and hired Tempo for Sasaram. On the way, the accused persons snatched Rs. 500/-, mobile phone from informant's pocket and took away his Tempo towards the village Jamuhar.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90097 of 2024(2) dt.15-02-2025 2/2 this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has figured in confessional statement of co-accused Suraj Prasad God @ Suraj Kumar God@ Suraj Prasad Gond, from whose possession, the looted tempo was recovered, has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 88860 of 2024. The petitioner is under custody since 25.07.2024.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dehri, Rohtas in connection with Dehri(Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 115 of 2024, subject to the following condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T