Md. Jawed @ Jabed@Jawed Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50974 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -159 Year- 2018 Thana -ARARIA District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Md. Jawed @ Jabed @Jawed Alam, Son of Late Basir. null
2. Md. Isha, Son of Late Basir.
3. Tabrej Son of Abul.
4. Bibi Tarranum Daughter of Md. Isha.
5. Bibi Mohina @ Bibi Mohania, Wife of Md. Jawed @ Jabed, All are resident of Village Mahishakol, Police Station - Araria, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.R.N.Paddar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chaubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in Araria P.S.Case No.159 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 149, 341, 323, 324, 448, 380, 354, 504, 506/34 of Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is of abusing and assault to the informant and other family members and also of taking away some articles.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is a case and counter case and nothing specific allegation has been attributed to the petitioners.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50974 of 2018 (2) dt.04-09-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in Araria P.S.Case No.159 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. and (1) one of the bailors must be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) the petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence and the petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U