Amit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81122 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2019 Thana- MORKAHI District- Khagaria ====================================================== AMIT YADAV Son of Umesh Yadav Resident of Village - Balaur, P.S.- Morkahi, Distt.- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
In fact there is no eye witness of the occurrence of murder of Golu Kumar. FIR was lodged after recovery of the dead body and the witnesses, who claimed to be eye witness of the occurrence, does not appear to be eye witness of the occurrence on overall consideration of their statement. Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that otherwise witnesses have supported the allegation of commission of assault by the petitioner and others to the deceased.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81122 of 2019(3) dt.18-03-2020 2/2 Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Morkahi Police Station Case No.107 of 2019, G.R.No.2470 of 2019, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case as well as petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned Trial Court, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
No observation made above shall prejudice the mind of the learned Trial Judge.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T