Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11/2024bail rejected

Karan Paswan @ Niranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-24Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2023 Thana- BARABAR TOURIST DistrictJehanabad ====================================================== Karan Paswan @ Niranjan Kumar S/o Pradip Paswan R/o Village- Dharaut, P.S.- Barabar Prayatak, Distt- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-01-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barabar Tourist P.S. Case no. 124 of 2023 registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the petitioner started to abuse his father and thereafter the four named accused persons including the petitioner herein started to assault him as a result of which he was seriously injured and died soon thereafter.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The occurrence has not taken place as alleged in the FIR.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11 of 2024(3) dt.24-01-2024 2/2 The allegations even as per FIR, are general and omnibus in nature. The father of the informant was a drunkard. The petitioner is a student of B.A. Part-II, is in custody since 28.9.2023 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

5. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the petitioner named therein, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U T