Manoranjan Singh @ Manoranjan Kumar Singh @ Bholu Singh @ Bholu Mukhiya @ Bholu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81598 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-596 Year-2019 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== MANORANJAN SINGH @ MANORANJAN KUMAR SINGH @ BHOLU SINGH @ BHOLU MUKHIYA @ BHOLU Son of Late Ramdev Singh Resident of Village - Bhawalpur, P.S.- Marhaura, Distt - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Binod Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 326, 379, 332, 333, 307, 302, 504 & 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1b)a/26/35/27 of Arms Act. The petitioner is not named in the FIR rather seven person are named in the FIR. The FIR named accused, namely, Abhishek Singh, Subodh Singh and Rohit Singh were the assailants of a constable and one A.S.I. Name of the petitioner surfaced during investigation of the case. In the statement of witnesses and other constables, Ranjan Kumar and Jitendra Kumar, name of the petitioner surfaced, however, no specific overtact is alleged against the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 30.08.2019. There is no material to substantiate that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81598 of 2019(3) dt.20-03-2020 2/2 petitioner is going to tamper with the evidence or hamper the trial. Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail on the basis of material aforesaid as well as on the basis of the fact that the petitioner is accused in other seven criminal cases stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

Since there is no substantial material against the petitioner in this case, only for criminal antecedent, the petitioner does not deserve further detention as undertrial prisoner, hence, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Marhaura P.S. Case No.596 of 2019, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case as well as the petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned Trial Court, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T