← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10422/2024bail granted

Jagu Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-08Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10422 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-919 Year-2023 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Jagu Mukhiya S/O - Ramchandra Mukhiya R/O, Village- Chailaha Bintoli, Police Station- Banjariya, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and allegation is of recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized motorcycle. It is next submitted that he came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10422 of 2024(2) dt.08-04-2024 2/3 inimical term. It is also submitted that in majority of the cases, the police, in a mechanical manner, is implicating the accused persons either at the instance of Chowkidar or local person but then it absolutely does not stand to reason that if Chowkidar was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he/she did not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR which further casts aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. Case No. 919 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. 7.

It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10422 of 2024(2) dt.08-04-2024 3/3 criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that the petitioner has more than two antecedent, in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T