Shekh Rahmat Mian @ Shekh Rahmat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5846 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2024 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Shekh Rahmat Mian @ Shekh Rahmat Son of Ahmad mian Resident of Village - Mura, P.S. - Govindganj, District - East Champaran 2.

Aagar Mian @ Shekh Aagar Son of Shekh Ahmad Mian @ Shekh Amjad @ Ahmad Mian Resident of Village - Mura, P.S. - Govindganj, District - East Champaran 3.

Shekh Amjad Mian @ Saikh Amjad @ Shekh Amjad Mian Son of Ahmad Mian Resident of Village - Mura, P.S. - Govindganj, District - East Champaran 4.

Mahmood Mian @ Shekh Mahjud Son of Ahmad Mian Resident of Village - Mura, P.S. - Govindganj, District - East Champaran 5.

Shaukat Ali @ Shekh Shaukat Ali Son of Shekh Mahmood Resident of Village - Mura, P.S. - Govindganj, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 307,379,504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners assaulted informant with knife and took out Rs.1200/- from the pocket of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5846 of 2025(3) dt.15-04-2025 2/2 informant.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Doctor has found simple injury. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I/Successor court, Motihari, East Champaran in Govindganj Police Station Case No. 260 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T