Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3552/2025dismissed

Md. Anjar @ Md. Anjar Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-27Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3552 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2023 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Anjar @ Md. Anjar Hussain Son of Md. Khalid Resident of Morwa Bazar, P.S.- Tajpur, District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr.Md. Soban Asghar, Advocate For the State :

Ms.Anita Kumari, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Aditya Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-06-2025 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 113 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34, 120B & 27 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 18.4.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10921 of 2024.

4. As per the prosecution case, two persons have been killed. Petitioner's involvement has surfaced in the killing of the deceased persons.

5. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3552 of 2025(3) dt.27-06-2025 2/2 that the trial is being delayed by the prosecution and only one witness has been examined and therefore, the petitioner deserves bail.

6. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the prosecution will examine the remaining witnesses shortly.

7. In these circumstances, I am not inclined to review my earlier order of rejection.

8. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

9. If the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T