← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4208/2025bail granted

Azad Alam @ Gulten v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-11Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4208 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2024 Thana- BHEJA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Azad Alam @ Gulten S/O Md. Saeed R/o Village- Balthi, P.S.- Bheja DistrictMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Patna 2.

Ranju Devi W/O Umesh Yadav R/o Village- Khajuri, P.S.- Bheja, DistrictMadhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md Soban Asghar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 42 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections-363, 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, Section-376 of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of POCSO Act was added.

3. The informant makes allegation of kidnapping of his daughter against the FIR named accused persons including the petitioner.

4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to the notice of this court towards paragraph-53 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4208 of 2025(3) dt.11-09-2025 2/2 the case diary which contains the statement of victim recorded under Section-164 of the Cr.P.C., in which, she has stated that her parents forcibly got solemnized her marriage with one, Saroj Yadav four months prior to the occurrence. After living one day in her matrimonial home, she came to her Mayke. She had love and affection with the petitioner. She went with the petitioner with her own sweet will and the petitioner and the victim are residing as husband and wife.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks before the court below be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-VIIth, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani Madhubani in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 42 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T