Tarkeshwar Chaudhary @ Tarkesh Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80895 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-668 Year-2019 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Tarkeshwar Chaudhary @ Tarkesh Chaudhary Son of Bansh Lal Chaudhary @ Banshi Lal Chaudhary Resident of Village - Supana, P.S. - Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rudal Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-01-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kudhni P.S.Case No.668 of 2019 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 414, 467, 468 and 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 38(i) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Though allegation is of recovery of huge quantity of liquor. However, petitioner was not there at the time of recovery rather his name surfaced in the confessional statement of coaccused. Petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2019. Investigation of the case is already complete. Considering the fact that there is no material against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80895 of 2019(2) dt.13-01-2020 2/2 the petitioner and there is no allegation that the petitioner is going to tamper with the evidence or abscond the process of law, let the above named petitioner be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kudhni P.S.Case No.668 of 2019, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and also that the petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the Court.
(Birendra Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T