Mahatab Ansari @ Mahtab Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.519 of 2024 ====================================================== Mahatab Ansari @ Mahtab Ansari S/o Md. Ehsan Ansari R/o- Pipra, Parsain Tola, Ramnagar, P.S. Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi. At Present Posted in Govt. Middle School, Ram Nagar- IInd, Sonbarsa, Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principle Secretary, Education Department Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

3.

The District Programme Officer (Literacy) Sitamarhi, District Sitamarhi. 4.

The Block Education Extension Officer, Sonbarsa, District Sitamarhi. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Sonbarsa, District Sitamarhi. 6.

The Circle Officer, Sonbarsa, District Sitamarhi. 7.

The Co-ordinator, Block Programme, Sonbarsa, District Sitarmarhi. 8.

The Headmaster, Government Primary School, Ram Nagar-II, Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel 23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents-State.

2. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation before the District Programme Officer (Literacy) Sitamarhi (respondent no. 3) along with all supporting judgments and documents within a period of two weeks and the respondent no. 3 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.

Patna High Court CWJC No.519 of 2024 dt.29-03-2024 2/2

3. Needless to state that respondent no.3 shall be solely liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 30.03.2024 Transmission Date NA