Mritunjay Mahto @ Bauku v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81352 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-914 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

MRITUNJAY MAHTO @ BAUKU Son of Doman Mahto Resident of Village - Bavangama, P.S.- Bihpur, Distt - Bhagalpur. 2.

Hira Das Son of Late Dasu Das Resident of Village -Babudih, P.S.- Bausi, Distt - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners are in custody since 15.10.2019 in connection with Kotwali (Jogsar) P.S. Case No. 914 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 342, 323, 364A, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present first information report has been lodged making false and frivolous allegations only to grab Rs. 6 lacs which had been taken by the informant and the informant has cheated several persons in a similar manner on the pretext of providing vehicle pollution checking machine.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81352 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Kotwali (Jogsar) P.S. Case No. 914 of 2019.

1. One of the bailors will be their own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, son, brother, sister and/or his wife.

2. The petitioners shall not indulge themselves in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

3. The petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

4. The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T