Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8932/2018bail granted

Jethu Hembram @ Jetha Hembram @ Jitu Hembram v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-28Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8932 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -40 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAIRA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Jethu Hembram @ Jetha Hembram @ Jitu Hembram, S/o Late Khakhu Hembram, Resident of Village- Mahengro, Police Station- Khaira, DistrictJamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 22.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56026 of 2017, with observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that now charge has been framed in this case and petitioner has been in custody since 15.02.2017 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts as well as in view of the order dated 22.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56026 of 2017, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8932 of 2018 (2) dt.28-02-2018 2/2 Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J -02nd, Jamui, in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 40 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T