Shaurabh Suman @ Saurabh Suman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3255 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2022 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Shaurabh Suman @ Saurabh Suman Son Of Santosh Kumar Yadav Resident of Village- Shyampur, Police Station- Alinagar District Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-01-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial no. 588 of 2023 arising out of Bahadurpur P.S. Case no. 250 of 2022 registered under section 304B of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant who is the Investigating Officer of U.D. Case no. 12 of 2022 submits that in course of investigation of the U.D case it transpired that as a result of torture, the deceased committed suicide. Thus F.I.R was registered under section 304B of the Indian Penal Code.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 6.12.2023 (Annexure-P/1) passed in Cr. Misc. no. 62702 of 2023. The petitioner is in custody since 11.6.2023 and while rejecting the prayer for bail on the earlier occasion, this Court had granted liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3255 of 2024(2) dt.19-01-2024 2/2 after framing of charge. Referring to the order at Annexure- P/4 it is submitted that charge had been framed against the petitioner in the learned trial Court on 26.5.2022 itself. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the trial.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R, the petitioner having remained in custody since 11.6.2023, the initiation of the case being registration of U.D case, the liberty granted in the earlier order rejection dated 6.12.2023 and charge having been framed in the learned trial Court, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sessions Trial no. 588 of 2023 arising out of Bahadurpur P.S. Case no. 250 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions JudgeIV, Darbhanga. (Partha Sarthy, J) Harsh/- U T