← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6353/2025allowed

Vijay Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-29Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6353 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2024 Thana- DOBHI District- Gaya ====================================================== Vijay Manjhi S/o- Babulal Manjhi Village- Gospur,Ps- Dobhi, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Dobhi P.S. Case 176 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of 10 liters illicit liquor from the house of co-accused Sunita Devi and 7.875 liters illicit liquor from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the first information report and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The alleged place of occurrence is the joint house and petitioner cannot be held liable for the alleged recovery. Petitioner is not in any way connected with the alleged occurrence. No incriminating article has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6353 of 2025(3) dt.29-05-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, no case is made out against the petitioner under the provisions of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Exclusive Special Excise Court No. V, Gaya in connection with Dobhi P.S. Case No. 176 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) mcverma/- U T