← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81294/2019bail granted

Pappu Sah @ Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-18Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81294 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2019 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Pappu Sah @ Pappu Kumar, Son of Shailendra Sah, Resident of Village - Ramnagra, P.S.- Riga, Dist.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 281 of 2019, registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016.

The accusation is of recovery of 75 bottles each containing 300 ml Nepali Saufi liquor from the sugarcane field of Rambricks Singh, from where, Ajay Singh and Hari Shankar Sah and petitioner were seen in fleeing condition by the local Choukidar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is accused in similar nature of two other cases, i.e., Riga P.S. Case No. 229 of 2019 and Riga P.S. Case No. 195 of 2019 due to that reason he has been implicated in the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81294 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 case mere on suspicion and petitioner is in custody since 14.10.2019.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge Excise Act, Sitamarhi, in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 281 of 2019. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T