Raj Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16900 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2017 Thana -HAJIPUR RPF/POST District- SARAN ====================================================== Raj Kishore Singh, Son of Lal Govind Singh, resident of village Sahdei Buzurg, P.S. Sahdei Buzurg, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anita Kumari Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Rita Verma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Hajipur/R.P.F. P.S. Case No. 08 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section 3 R S (A.K.) Act, Sections 147, 145 and 153 of the Railway Act.

In the written report it is alleged that 10-15 unknown persons were stealing 6873 litres (MS) Motor Spirit from the tanker of goods train which was standing at Sahdei Buzurg Railway Station.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has clean antecedent. He is not named in the written report.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16900 of 2018 (2) dt.03-04-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Hajipur/R.P.F. P.S. Case No. 08 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway, Sonepur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T