Nitish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87399 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2025 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Nitish Yadav S/o- Jai Prakash Singh, R/v- Garbhey PS- Kargahar, DistRohtas at Sasaram 2.

Rishu Yadav S/o- Rajendra Singh, R/v- Garbhey PS- Kargahar, Dist- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Singh, Advocate Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate Mr. Radha Krishna, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioners seek regular bail in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 352, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, petitioners along with other co-accused persons committed mar-pit with the informant and took away his motorcycle along with a bag containing laptop, Rs.14,000/- and other papers.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. There is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87399 of 2025(2) dt.22-12-2025 2/2 were not arrested on the spot and nothing incriminating article has been recovered from possession of the petitioners. The allegations are general in nature. Petitioner no.1 has two criminal antecedents whereas petitioner no.2 has one criminal antecedent out of which one case was earlier lodged by the informant himself. The charge sheet has already been submitted after investigation and there is no chance of absconding of petitioners or tampering with the evidence. Petitioners are in custody since 23.09.2025 and they undertake to cooperate in the trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties as well as the period of custody, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateIV, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No.304 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) harish/- U T