← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1270/2026dismissed

Tulsi Rajbhar @ Tulsi Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1270 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar ====================================================== Tulsi Rajbhar @ Tulsi Rai Son of Late Kishun Rai R/V- Khatuali, P.S.- Dumraon, Dist.- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Vasantu @ Santlal Son of Late Prasidadhan @ Late Prasidhan R/VJamgaon, P.S.- Kaithi, Dist.- Sonbhadra (U.P.) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Dimpal Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The defect(s) as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter are ignored.

3. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with POCSO Case No.127 of 2024, arising out of Buxar Mahila P.S. Case No. 62 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 70(1), 324(4) of B.N.S. and 4,6 of POCSO Act.

4. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 25.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.38710 of 2025.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1270 of 2026(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/2

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial is on the verge of conclusion and the Doctor and I.O. are left to be examined.

6. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that when the trial is on the verge of conclusion, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) mdrashid/- U T