Md. Shazad @ Garo Mian @ Garo v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.688 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2024 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== Md. Shazad @ Garo Mian @ Garo S/O Md. Nasimuddin @ Nasiruddin @ Md. Nasir Udadin Resident of Village- Milaki Dibari, P.S- Muffasil, DistrictNawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.A. Shamsi, Advocate :
Mr. Sameer Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 390 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-AA), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the F.I.R., police, on the basis of secret information that some miscreants run a mini gun factory, raided the place and apprehended two persons including the petitioner. It is further alleged that various articles relating to manufacture of guns were recovered from the said place.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.688 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered arms and ammunitions. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 07.10.2024 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15662 of 2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, claim based on parity as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.688 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2025 3/3 No. 390 of 2024.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T