Babul v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19202 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2017 Thana -AMAUR District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Babul, Son of Harun, R/o Village- Sidhiya, P.S.- Amour, DistrictPurnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bisheshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 69 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 307, 353, 427, 332, 333 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and others is of creating unlawful assembly and creating nuisance in the referral Hospital Amour and were rioting and when police went there, they attacked on them.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that several persons had assembled in the hospital for protest of death of one person and petitioner has falsely been made accused in this case and no specific allegation has been attributed to him. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19202 of 2018 (3) dt.26-04-2018 2/2 event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Purnia. in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 69 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T