Md. Rahil v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82652 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2019 Thana- KOCHADHAMAN District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md. Rahil S/o Late Majebul Rahman Resident of Barijan, P.S.- Kochadhaman, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 265 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Section 413/414 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged that petitioner used to purchase and sale the stolen car. The informant apprehended this petitioner and from his possession one stolen motorcycle was recovered for which he did not produce any valid document.
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The said motorcycle belongs to Noorsad @ Don and Akilo and petitioner had purchased from them at Rs. 10,000/-. Chargesheet has already been submitted. Petitioner is in custody since 16.10.2019.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82652 of 2019(2) dt.12-12-2019 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 265 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T