← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4535/2024dismissed

Mahesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Pratay Amrit Principal Secretary, Health Department

2026-04-17Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4535 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5995 of 2018 ====================================================== Mahesh Prasad Son of Late Lal Das, Resident of 9D H Colony Fourth Grade Housing P.O. Sultanganj, P.S. Alamganj, District, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Pratay Amrit Principal Secretary, Health Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Dr. Niharika Sharan The Director-in-Chief, Health Department, Government of Bihar.

3.

Sri Sunil Kumar, The District Provident Fund Officer, Patna. 4.

Dr. Ashok Kumar, The Deputy Director-cum-In-Charge Tuberculosis Demonstration and Training Centre, Agam Kuan, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel 23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 17-04-2026 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Parties are present.

2. Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties submits that the order, for alleged non-compliance of which the present contempt petition has been filed, has already been duly complied with, as a reasoned order has been passed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that although an order has been passed in purported compliance with the judgment dated 15.04.2024 rendered in CWJC No. 5995 of 2018, but the petitioner is aggrieved with

Patna High Court MJC No.4535 of 2024(6) dt.17-04-2026 2/2 the said order.

4. In view of the fact that a speaking order has been passed by the opposite parties, the present MJC petition stands dismissed.

5. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the said order, before the appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U