Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar @ Mallu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87332 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2025 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar @ Mallu, S/o Ajit Singh, R/o VillageGhatrien, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Rupa Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Pushpa Sinha 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 337 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 3(5) of the BNS.
3. The prosecution case, in brief is that the informant being a police official received information that two motorcycles were lying abandoned. It is alleged that when he reached at the spot and inquired about the same, one of the villager Priyanshu Singh @ Vir Sisodiya told that the alleged motorcycles were kept hidden by the petitioner. It is further alleged that when the informant inquired about the papers of the motorcycles from the family members of the petitioner, they failed to produce so.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87332 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 2/3 petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner was neither present at the place of occurrence nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. The petitioner has no connection whatsoever with the vehicles in any manner. The vehicle in question was parked in front of the house of one Late Vishwanath Pratap Singh and the petitioner has no knowledge about the same. He further submits that it is not stated in the FIR that this petitioner has parked the said motorcycles there. Petitioner has been dragged in the present case only on the basis of disclosure made by Vir Sisodiya.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, Bihar in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 337 of 2025
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87332 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, with further condition that:- (I) One of the bailors must be family relatives of the petitioner.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) khushbu/- U T