Bharat Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4455 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2020 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
BHARAT MAHTO SON OF PACHU MAHTO R/O VASDEV CHAPRA @ BASDEV CHAPRA, P.S.- KALYANPUR, DIST.- EAST CHAMPARAN 2.
BHAGWAN MAHTO @ SRI BHAGWAN MAHTO SON OF LANGAT MAHTO R/O VASDEV CHAPRA @ BASDEV CHAPRA, P.S.- KALYANPUR, DIST.- EAST CHAMPARAN 3.
MAHABIR MAHTO SON OF DAHAUR MAHTO R/O VASDEV CHAPRA @ BASDEV CHAPRA, P.S.- KALYANPUR, DIST.- EAST CHAMPARAN 4.
RAJUMAHTO SON OF RAGHUBIR MAHTO R/O VASDEV CHAPRA @ BASDEV CHAPRA, P.S.- KALYANPUR, DIST.- EAST CHAMPARAN 5.
RAMBABU MAHTO SON OF DAHAUR MAHTO R/O VASDEV CHAPRA @ BASDEV CHAPRA, P.S.- KALYANPUR, DIST.- EAST CHAMPARAN 6.
SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL MAHTO SON OF BHARAT MAHTO @ BHARAT CHAUHAN R/O VASDEV CHAPRA @ BASDEV CHAPRA, P.S.- KALYANPUR, DIST.- EAST CHAMPARAN 7.
MANOJ KUMAR @ MANOJ MAHTO SON OF BHARAT MAHTO @ BHARAT CHAUHAN R/O VASDEV CHAPRA @ BASDEV CHAPRA, P.S.- KALYANPUR, DIST.- EAST CHAMPARAN 8.
RAGHUBIR MAHTO SON OF DAHAUR MAHTO R/O VASDEV CHAPRA @ BASDEV CHAPRA, P.S.- KALYANPUR, DIST.- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Krishna Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2024 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 37 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 354B, 379, 504 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4455 of 2024(2) dt.19-02-2024 2/2 the Daain Act.
3.
The learned APP, at the outset, submits that the offence for which the instant FIR has been instituted against the petitioners carries punishment of seven years or less, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
4.
In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. the State of Bihar).
5. The petitioners would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of three weeks from today with a web copy of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. the state of Bihar) and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the the order dated 13-22024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T