Patna High CourtCR. MISC./89700/2025dismissed

Anshu Chandrawanshi @ Anshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-24Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80365 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ashish Raj Yadav S/O Rakesh Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Rakiyan Bigaha, P.S.- Amjhor, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 89700 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2025 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Anshu Chandrawanshi @ Anshu Kumar S/o Satendra Chandrawanshi @ Satendra Kahar R/o Village - - Jamuhar, P.S - Mufassil (Dehri), District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80365 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 89700 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate Mr. D.K. Singh, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant in both the cases.

2. The petitioner of both the aforesaid cases seeks bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80365 of 2025(4) dt.24-03-2026 2/2 in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 20 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are involved in the killing the deceased.

4. In the trial, all the private witnesses have been examined and only three witnesses are left to be examined.

5. Considering the allegation and the stage of trial, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the applications stand dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T