Pappu Rawani @ Pappu Kamkar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89576 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2025 Thana- Bahoranpur District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Pappu Rawani @ Pappu Kamkar S/o Bilar Kamkar @ Barmeshwar Kamkar R/o Vill- Karja, P.S- Bahoranpur, Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Omprakash Pandey, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that her brother-in-law, namely, Chhotak Yadav was consuming liquor in an orchard with petitioner, Ajit, Ram Udar Rawani and Bilar on 26.06.2025, further, at 11:00 p.m., her son called, when Chhotak voice felt nervous and he said that a conspiracy is being hatched against him and from behind, voice was being heard. It is further alleged that on 27.06.2025 Mulki informed at 06:00 A.M. that Chhotak has been killed,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89576 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/3 accordingly, the informant reached the place of occurrence and saw the dead body lying near a tree and a towel was wrapped around his neck, it is next alleged that about five months back an amount of Rs.1 lakh was given by the brother-in-law of the informant for purchasing cow and 20 days back a dispute had arisen with regard to the returning of the amount and Pappu (petitioner) had threatened, thus, alleges based on suspicion that accused persons including the petitioner killed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Bilar Kamkar along with Ajit Kamkar had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.67779 of 2025 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated 08.10.2025 after considering the case on merits and in detail. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into consideration the order dated 08.10.2025 in Cr. Misc. No.67779 of 2025, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89576 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026 3/3 anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bahoranpur P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. However, if the investigating officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not cooperating in the investigation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T