← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/358/2025disposed

Prahlad Kumar Singh @ Prahlad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-23Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.358 of 2025 ====================================================== Prahlad Kumar Singh @ Prahlad Singh S/o- Late Babunand Kishore Singh @ Nandkishore Singh, R/o- Village- Rampurmadhav, Post- Sasamusa, P.S.- Kuchaykot, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Urban and Housing Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Urban and Housing Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

4.

The Additional Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur. 5.

The Deputy Collector Land Reform, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. 6.

The Circle Officer, Hajipur at Vaishali.

7.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Hajipur at Vaishali. 8.

The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Hajipur at Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore, G.P. 18 For Nagar Parishad Hazipur :

Mr. Ankit Katriar, Advocate Mr. Kumar Manish, Advocate Ms. Aishwarya Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 23-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Nagar Parishad Hazipur.

Patna High Court CWJC No.358 of 2025(2) dt.23-01-2025 2/3

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to either release the petitioner's landed properties or to pay adequate compensation, as these properties, according to the petitioner, have been encroached upon by the Hazipur Municipal Corporation and a pakka road has been constructed over it. The petitioner claims ownership based on the Cadastral Survey Records of Right, which, however, are not readable.

3. Therefore, without entering into the merits or demerits of the case, this Court directs respondent Nos. 7 to pass an order on the representation of the petitioner as contained in Annexure P/9 to the Writ Petition, after serving and verifying with the concerned department that whether the land in question belongs to the petitioner or not?

4. In this regard, the petitioner is directed to file clear and legible Cadastral Survey Records of Right, as well as documents relating to any Ceiling Case, if pending or disposed of, concerning the petitioner's family, if any. Upon receiving all relevant documents, the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, shall pass a reasoned and speaking order after hearing all concerned parties within six months.

Patna High Court CWJC No.358 of 2025(2) dt.23-01-2025 3/3

5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U